Monday, April 3, 2017

4/3/17: SCOTUS decides courts can consider 924(c) mand. mins. in sentencing for the underlying offense & a 9th Cir. restitution case


In Dean v. United States, 581 U.S. ---(2017), the unanimous Court decided that, in sentencing a defendant who has been convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), the district court can consider the mandatory minimum for the 924(c) in determining the appropriate sentence for the underlying predicate offense.

Section 924(c) criminalizes using or carrying a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime, or possessing a firearm in furtherance of such an underlying crime. It also mandates a distinct penalty, one that must be imposed “in addition to the punishment provided for [the predicate] crime of violence or drug trafficking crime.” §924(c)(1)(A) (emphasis added). A first-time offender under §924(c) receives a five-year mandatory minimum. A “second or subsequent conviction” under §924(c) carries an additional 25-year mandatory minimum. §§924(c)(1)(A)(i),(C)(i).

The Court determined, “[n]othing in §924(c) restricts the authority conferred on sentencing courts by §3553(a) and the related provisions to consider a sentence imposed under §924(c).”

It further explained: “The Government speaks of Congress’s intent to prevent district courts from bottoming out sentences for predicate §924(c) offenses whenever they think a mandatory minimum under §924(c) is already punishment enough. But no such intent finds expression in the language of §924(c). That language simply requires any mandatory minimum under §924(c) to be imposed “in addition to” the sentence for the predicate offense, and to run consecutively to that sentence. Nothing in those requirements prevents a sentencing court from considering a mandatory minimum under §924(c) when calculating an appropriate sentence for the predicate offense.”

Moving on.

In United States v. Blackwell, --- F.3d---, Case No. 16-10287 (9th Cir. 2017), the Court held that, even for those ordered to pay restitution before enactment of the “Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996,” the time limits in that Act apply.  Thus, “the liability to pay a fine or restitution shall terminate the later of 20 years from the entry of judgment or 20 years after the release from imprisonment of the defendant.”